nnp:piezoelectricity_in_wurtzite
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
nnp:piezoelectricity_in_wurtzite [2019/10/31 17:52] stefan.birner [Specify crystal orientation] |
nnp:piezoelectricity_in_wurtzite [2024/01/03 17:50] stefan.birner removed |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| === References === | === References === | ||
| - | * A.E. Romanov //et al//., Journal of Applied Physics **100**, 023522 (2006) | + | * A.E. Romanov, T.J. Baker, S. Nakamura, and J.S. Speck, Journal of Applied Physics **100**, 023522 (2006) |
| * S. Schulz and O. Marquardt, Phys. Rev. Appl. **3**, 064020 (2015) | * S. Schulz and O. Marquardt, Phys. Rev. Appl. **3**, 064020 (2015) | ||
| * S.K. Patra and S. Schulz, Phys. Rev. B **96**, 155307 (2017) | * S.K. Patra and S. Schulz, Phys. Rev. B **96**, 155307 (2017) | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
| We note that the expression in the third case includes the other two special cases. To approximate the direction with integer entries, we multiply 100 and take the floor function: | We note that the expression in the third case includes the other two special cases. To approximate the direction with integer entries, we multiply 100 and take the floor function: | ||
| <code> | <code> | ||
| - | $gamma = $c_InGaN / $a_InGaN # c/a ratio; ideal ratio of c/a in wurtzite is SQRT(8/3)=1.63299 | + | $gamma = $c_InGaN / $a_InGaN # c/a ratio |
| + | # ideal c/a ratio in wurtzite is SQRT(8/3)=1.63299 | ||
| $h = floor(100*sin(theta)) | $h = floor(100*sin(theta)) | ||
| $l = floor(100*2*gamma*cos(theta)/sqrt(3)) | $l = floor(100*2*gamma*cos(theta)/sqrt(3)) | ||
| Line 147: | Line 148: | ||
| Analytical expression is derived as follows [Schulz2015]. Since we are interested in the polarization normal to the interface, it is useful to switch to the simulation coordinate system $(x', y', z')$. This can be done by transforming the polarization vector and the strain tensor to the simulation system, | Analytical expression is derived as follows [Schulz2015]. Since we are interested in the polarization normal to the interface, it is useful to switch to the simulation coordinate system $(x', y', z')$. This can be done by transforming the polarization vector and the strain tensor to the simulation system, | ||
| $$ | $$ | ||
| - | P_{\mu'}^{(1)}=\sum_{\mu=1}^3 R_{\mu'\mu} P_\mu^{(1)},\ \ | + | P_{\mu'}^{(1)}=\left(R P^{(1)} \right)_{\mu'}=\sum_{\mu=1}^3 R_{\mu'\mu} P_\mu^{(1)},\ \ |
| - | \epsilon_{\mu'\nu'}=\sum_{\mu,\nu=1}^3 R_{\mu'\mu}R_{\nu'\nu}\epsilon_{\mu\nu}, | + | \epsilon_{\mu'\nu'}=\left(R\epsilon R^{-1} \right)_{\mu'\nu'}=\sum_{\mu,\nu=1}^3 R_{\mu'\mu}R_{\nu'\nu}\epsilon_{\mu\nu}, |
| $$ | $$ | ||
| - | where the $3\times3$ rotation matrix $R$ accounts for a rotation of angle $\theta$. Prime denotes the axes in simulation coordinate system. These equations can be expressed in vector form as | + | where the $3\times3$ rotation matrix $R$ accounts for a rotation of angle $\theta$ and we have used the fact that the rotation matrix is orthogonal: $(R^{-1})_{\mu\nu}=R_{\nu\mu}$. Prime denotes the axes in simulation coordinate system. These equations can be expressed in vector form as |
| $$ | $$ | ||
| \begin{pmatrix} | \begin{pmatrix} | ||
Page Tools
